﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>TEAM 1500: Recent Comments</title>
	<updated>2010-03-12T14:24:40Z</updated>
	<id>http://team1500.org/comments/atom.aspx</id>
	<link href="http://team1500.org/comments/atom.aspx" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link href="http://team1500.org" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.0">Quick Blogcast</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on It Is Not About The Dentists</title>
		<link href="http://team1500.org/2007/01/28/it-is-not-about-the-dentists.aspx#comment-659572" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:team1500.org,2007-11-14:659572</id>
		<author>
			<name>Bonny</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-11-15T06:34:59Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-15T06:34:59Z</published>
		<content type="html">This is a great service to dental phobics. However, women must make sure there is a female attendant with them at all times and I do mean at all times so no sexual abuse can ever happen. Generally speaking, women are too trusting and must be protected.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Your Friendly Minnesota Dentist and Bathroom Monitor</title>
		<link href="http://team1500.org/2007/05/03/your-friendly-minnesota-dentist-and-bathroom-monitor.aspx#comment-652633" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:team1500.org,2007-11-11:652633</id>
		<author>
			<name>bonny</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-11-12T05:58:12Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-12T05:58:12Z</published>
		<content type="html">I'm a female and Ken is right. There must be a female in my presence at all times if I'm sedated and not fully aware what is happening to my body. There are thousands of cases of medical sexual abuse being litigated while women are awake so what women unless she's naive, would allow herself to be near unconscious and alone with a male dentist. Of course most dentists are moral but the laws must protect our privacy and at the same time not compromise safety.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Your Friendly Minnesota Dentist and Bathroom Monitor</title>
		<link href="http://team1500.org/2007/05/03/your-friendly-minnesota-dentist-and-bathroom-monitor.aspx#comment-648818" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:team1500.org,2007-11-09:648818</id>
		<author>
			<name>ken</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-11-10T05:35:31Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-10T05:35:31Z</published>
		<content type="html">Did it ever occur to these arrogant pin head dentists that while groggy and sedated, it will be my wife's decision to let the good male dentist watch her urinate not his. Hello.....many men and the last I looked dentists are men, would find this rather sexual not medical. This regulation can't possibly be taken seriously.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Your Friendly Minnesota Dentist and Bathroom Monitor</title>
		<link href="http://team1500.org/2007/05/03/your-friendly-minnesota-dentist-and-bathroom-monitor.aspx#comment-648776" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:team1500.org,2007-11-09:648776</id>
		<author>
			<name>ken</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-11-10T05:15:27Z</updated>
		<published>2007-11-10T05:15:27Z</published>
		<content type="html">If I ever found out my wife or daughter was subjected to this bathroom break sexual abuse by a male dentist, I might go to jail but that dentist better find a way of growing new hands to work in his profession because I'm breaking them. Besides, what female will allow this invasion of privacy. The arrogance of these medical people.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on It Is Not About The Dentists</title>
		<link href="http://team1500.org/2007/01/28/it-is-not-about-the-dentists.aspx#comment-439639" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:team1500.org,2007-07-17:439639</id>
		<author>
			<name>Patricia-Missouri</name>
			<uri>http://team1500.org</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-07-18T03:30:05Z</updated>
		<published>2007-07-18T03:30:05Z</published>
		<content type="html">Conscious sedation has been and should continue to be the choice made by a patient and his/her dentist. As long as a dentist is legally trained and up to date, patients have been up front with their medical history then it isn't up to any board, state or entity to make such a determination as whether to sedate or not to sedate. This issue is a public affront to the intelligence, feelings and fears of dental patients and the dentists treating them.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on TEAM 1500 Is No Gentleman -- Thankfully!</title>
		<link href="http://team1500.org/2007/05/06/xxxx.aspx#comment-349612" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:team1500.org,2007-05-08:349612</id>
		<author>
			<name>James E Sparaga DMD</name>
			<uri>http://www.machiasdental.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-05-08T20:49:04Z</updated>
		<published>2007-05-08T20:49:04Z</published>
		<content type="html">Unfortunatelyk your'e right.  There is no time nor need to be gentlemanly about this political fight. The ADA woulld do the seme, if tey did not enjoy their safety ofnumbers.  As an 800 lb. gorilla, they can afford to be polite while they eviscerate general dentistry and deprive the population of this specific type of care. I submit that on the floors of state legislatures, the gorilla will fall. There, and only there, will we have the numbers to dwarf the gorilla. The  people will RULE!</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on True Patient Safety and the ADA’s Proposed Education ‘Tax’</title>
		<link href="http://team1500.org/2007/03/14/true-patient-safety-and-the-adas-proposed-education-tax.aspx#comment-299486" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:team1500.org,2007-03-25:299486</id>
		<author>
			<name>Richard Masterson</name>
			<uri>http://masterson.mystarband.net</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-03-25T18:35:46Z</updated>
		<published>2007-03-25T18:35:46Z</published>
		<content type="html">Yes! It is the lack of access to OCS that puts patients at risk. Thanks.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on TEAM 1500 Asks U.S. Surgeon General To Intercede With ADA</title>
		<link href="http://team1500.org/2007/03/09/team-1500-asks-us-surgeon-general-to-intercede-with-ada.aspx#comment-298278" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:team1500.org,2007-03-23:298278</id>
		<author>
			<name>brad houston, dds</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-03-24T02:17:17Z</updated>
		<published>2007-03-24T02:17:17Z</published>
		<content type="html">Great letter, Dean!  Very incisive; has a lot of bite.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on More Letters of Protest from Concerned Dentists</title>
		<link href="http://team1500.org/2007/03/05/more-letters-of-protest-from-concerned-dentists.aspx#comment-286929" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:team1500.org,2007-03-14:286929</id>
		<author>
			<name>mark dibona</name>
			<uri>http://drmarkdibona.com</uri>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-03-14T10:17:27Z</updated>
		<published>2007-03-14T10:17:27Z</published>
		<content type="html">35 years of general practice after a 3 year GPR. 25 years of IV sedation and now almost exclusively PO sedation. 100% safety record, and now I'm being told I'm not qualified. Bull! This is just another turf battle! Implants, perio, and now sedation. I'm ashamed of what our colleagues are doing, and I'm ashamed that the ADA is ignoring the majority of its constituents and allowing itself to be bullied by special interest groups.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on More Letters of Protest from Concerned Dentists</title>
		<link href="http://team1500.org/2007/03/05/more-letters-of-protest-from-concerned-dentists.aspx#comment-279674" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:team1500.org,2007-03-07:279674</id>
		<author>
			<name>Dr John D Tabak</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2007-03-08T01:10:53Z</updated>
		<published>2007-03-08T01:10:53Z</published>
		<content type="html">When Sargenti advocated rotary instrumentation the endodontists howled, but now the dental schools are teaching it to the predoc's.

When Paul Keyes advocated soft tissue management the periodontists screamed.  Is there a periodontist anywhere now who does not have a soft tissue management revenue stream?

Oral surgeons and and fellows of the unrecognized Board of Dental Anesthesiology cannot be allowed to hi-jack oral sedation.

The difference between professionals and tradesmen is that we do not have professional secrets and all are allowed to practice to the limits of their current capability.</content>
	</entry>
</feed>